Skip to main content

Times, they are a'changin'...

Author's note: this blog has been reprinted, per Jay Jacot's request, from Sunday, June 7th. All the events recorded here are to the best of my knowledge. I've also made some corrections (again, as per request), so it's a little different, if you've read it before.

Whew! A lot can happen while you're out drinking. I went to a quiet after-party following my church's open house (St. Mary Magdalene's Orthodox Church in Fenton), and missed my weekly meeting with Comics Obscura.

And guess what happened?

They're no longer Comics Obscura!

Yes, friends, the Comics Obscura group and the Comics Obscura publication are now, officially, no longer affiliated. I don't have all the details; but from what I've gathered, the Comics Obscura group no longer exists, and those members formerly of Comics Obscura have now formed their own group, Dark Corner Productions. Comics Obscura, the publication, is still in operation, but the main editor/publisher/shareholder in the operation, one Jay Jacot, has taken full ownership of the Comics Obscura label, which means the members of the group had to take on a different name; hence, Dark Corner Productions. My Vice Presidency of the group (oh, did I mention that? I became Vice President about a week ago! It's actually kind of exciting...) has rolled over to the new group, with one Joe Haines as acting President, and Christy Hans as Treasurer/Head of Merchandise Department.

What are my thoughts on the breakup? Well, neither mad nor glad, just a little relieved. Things had been a little tense as of late: confusion over "ownership" of the group, sudden changes to the submission process for the publication, impatience with the publication process, miscommunication and frustration abounding. Comics Obscura #4 was definitely a turning point for us, highlighting all of our problems; it was uncertain whether the group (by whatever name) could survive. Let's just say I'm breathing a little easier, now that things have come to a head.

I see this turn of events as an opportunity. Our esteemed Editor's contributions to the group cannot be overstated; but the fact is, one man alone could not bear the weight of the group and its sister publication on his shoulders for long, especially with the responsibilities he has taken on at work and at home. The group now has a chance to stand on its own two feet and see what it can do. The group has a long way to go to become a legitimate publisher in its own right, certainly, but from the dramatic improvements I have seen in terms of specific group members deciding to shoulder the burden, I think we can make a go of it. There is a lot of ambition and certainly enough talent in my colleagues; all we need now is a little direction.

But enough. Let us lay aside tomorrow's concerns until tomorrow (or at least until Friday, when the group meets). It is now midnight, and I have a busy day planned tomorrow. It involves Bristol board, ink, and several pairs of navy blue shorts (perhaps it's best not to ask). At any rate, I am plum tuckered out, and, like a college kid with a fistful of foodstamps, feel the need to turn in.

Rick Out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Problem with Reconstructing Deinonychus

So as you may know, I am partly obsessed with dinosaurs. Scratch that - there's a small lobe of my brain devoted to dinosaurs. I love em, God help me. I even have a super-double-plus-top-secret dinosaur comic maybe in the works...but you didn't hear it from me. Anywho... Part of my problem is in the reconstruction of said prehistoric beasties, namely those icons of American dino-obsession, Deinonychus ( Velociraptor  to you Jurassic Park  aficionados...it's not just a Hollywood bastardization, there's a complicated story behind it which I covered in this old post ). Now, we all know what Deinonychus looked like: wolf-size, sleek, toothsome head balanced by a long tail, grasping front claws and of course the eponymous "terrible claw" on its hind foot. The shape is burned into our collective unconscious; you could construct the most fantastic amalgam of different bits and pieces, but as long as you include the sickle-claw, you're golden. The devil, of

Artist Spotlight: Tom Eaton

I wanted to do a quick artist spotlight on Tom Eaton, best known for his work in Boy's Life Magazine. I used to have a subscription to Boy's Life  when I was a kid; unfortunately I didn't keep any of them, as they just weren't...I don't know, not really worth keeping. I just remember it as being 90% toy advertisements, some "how to get along with others" advice, the same camping article reprinted 20 million times, and some half-funny comics. As the years went on, the advertisements got bigger and louder, the articles became less interesting, and the comics section got shorter and shorter. But there was one gem hidden in the midst of the mediocrity: artist Tom Eaton. He wrote and illustrated "The Wacky Adventures of Pedro" ( BL's  burro mascot), "Dink & Duff", and myriad other comics, crossword puzzles, games, and short pieces. He was the magazine's resident cartoonist, and about the only reason I actually read the magazi

Raptors II: I might owe Luis V. Rey an apology...

Hello, patient readers. I've blogged about Raptors before, specifically Deinonychus and the problems of depicting dinosaurs in general. In an earlier post, I was wrestling with the then newly-popular preponderance of plumage on our favorite Terrible Lizards, and while I finally conceded that Deinonychus and Co. were probably fully feathered, I whined and hemmed about the amount of feathers and griped about how dinosaur lineages with no evidence for feathers at all were now being given fabulous coats. In the midst of this, I decried the new crop of bad paleo-art, using this image as my piéce de resistance: Credit: Luis V. Rey, from his blog . Essentially my big scientific argument ran along the lines of, "Looks dumb, therefore wrong". It seems now that I might have to eat that argument, slathered in Nelson Muntz' Gourmet Ha-Ha Sauce ...with one important caveat, which I'll get to later. Since writing that blog post - in fact, several years later - I'