Skip to main content

Book Review: Rapedome by Alan Houston

Rapedome
Alan Houston
(
Astronaut Books)

(Full disclosure: the author of this novel is the ex-husband of a good friend of mine. This review is purely for my own interest, and not intended for promotional purposes).

I'm not a huge fan of shock fiction - you read one Chuck Palahniuk novel, you can plot out the next ones fairly easily. And while I appreciate postmodernism, I find most of the efforts in that direction dubious at best. Pynchon is an attention-starved bore; Vonnegut had a moment of brilliance and then got tweedy; Tom Robbins is annoyingly self-righteous and earnest. David Foster Wallace is a shining exception, but even he gets off on his own cleverness at times. Ultimately the cardinal sin of these authors is that, for all their razzle-dazzle, they forget to just shut up and tell a story.

Rapedome is different. Out of obscurity comes an author who finally makes postmodern literature fun.

Just from the title, you can tell Houston is here to rattle some cages. The plot revolves around a mysterious backwoods silo where all societal rules and roles are suspended, and in the slippery darkness its participants engage in the worst trespasses imaginable. Some are blackmailed into coming, others kidnapped; some just show up looking to party. All are irrevocably changed by the experience. Though the point of view jumps from one character to another, it often lingers on several bizarre characters: the hypersexual and dangerous Lola; the psychotic kindergarten teacher Peter; the idiot President of the United States, Ginesap; and the mysterious, melancholy billionaire creator of the Rapedome itself. Along the way these characters are perpetrators and victims of rape, assault, murder, pedophilia, and Japanese game shows. And it's all funny as hell.

Houston is definitely here to poke fun at every single societal more and taboo he encounters, from feminism to civil rights to sexual identity, but his jabs are more winking than cruel. They're just par for the course - the reader bought their ticket when they read past the cover. And yet for a shock novel, the writing is surprisingly mature - the author isn't here to say, "See? See? I made a dooky on the carpet! Whaddaya think of that, huh?!" Where Pynchon would insert another chorus line to get himself out of a literary pickle, Houston keeps the ball rolling with crazed focus. One gets the sense of a narrative game of Mousetrap: it's Rube Goldbergian in execution, but care is taken to direct the reader from one outrageous situation to the next, to make sure nothing gets stale or repetitive. It's telling that Rapedome is so short, compared to its bloated predecessors; Houston actually listened to his editor, it seems. In a maximalist genre, tight prose can make the experience much more satisfying.

The only bad thing about Rapedome is its ending. Imagine a brilliant, raucous party where the host suddenly glances at his watch, stops everything, and spends five minutes elucidating dryly on the dangers of alcohol abuse. This sudden moralizing is only vaguely relevant, and leaves the reader scratching their head. Topping it off is the bizarre non-sequitur of a divine apparition. Is it Deus Ex Machina? An inside joke? Was this foreshadowed some pages back? It all feels hastily thrown together.

Thankfully the last few pages are so inconsequential, they have no bearing on the enjoyment which preceded them. This Wile E. Coyote-like spin through a mad but well-organized mind will leave you giggling and breathless. Rapedome knows it's audacious, funny, and blisteringly weird. Maybe its comment on the "darkness behind society" isn't especially original, but Houston certainly knows how to use it. I look forward to this author's next works, of which I hope there will be many more to come.

Final Verdict: 4 out of 5.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Problem with Reconstructing Deinonychus

So as you may know, I am partly obsessed with dinosaurs. Scratch that - there's a small lobe of my brain devoted to dinosaurs. I love em, God help me. I even have a super-double-plus-top-secret dinosaur comic maybe in the works...but you didn't hear it from me. Anywho... Part of my problem is in the reconstruction of said prehistoric beasties, namely those icons of American dino-obsession, Deinonychus ( Velociraptor  to you Jurassic Park  aficionados...it's not just a Hollywood bastardization, there's a complicated story behind it which I covered in this old post ). Now, we all know what Deinonychus looked like: wolf-size, sleek, toothsome head balanced by a long tail, grasping front claws and of course the eponymous "terrible claw" on its hind foot. The shape is burned into our collective unconscious; you could construct the most fantastic amalgam of different bits and pieces, but as long as you include the sickle-claw, you're golden. The devil, of...

Artist Spotlight: Tom Eaton

I wanted to do a quick artist spotlight on Tom Eaton, best known for his work in Boy's Life Magazine. I used to have a subscription to Boy's Life  when I was a kid; unfortunately I didn't keep any of them, as they just weren't...I don't know, not really worth keeping. I just remember it as being 90% toy advertisements, some "how to get along with others" advice, the same camping article reprinted 20 million times, and some half-funny comics. As the years went on, the advertisements got bigger and louder, the articles became less interesting, and the comics section got shorter and shorter. But there was one gem hidden in the midst of the mediocrity: artist Tom Eaton. He wrote and illustrated "The Wacky Adventures of Pedro" ( BL's  burro mascot), "Dink & Duff", and myriad other comics, crossword puzzles, games, and short pieces. He was the magazine's resident cartoonist, and about the only reason I actually read the magazi...

Raptors II: I might owe Luis V. Rey an apology...

Hello, patient readers. I've blogged about Raptors before, specifically Deinonychus and the problems of depicting dinosaurs in general. In an earlier post, I was wrestling with the then newly-popular preponderance of plumage on our favorite Terrible Lizards, and while I finally conceded that Deinonychus and Co. were probably fully feathered, I whined and hemmed about the amount of feathers and griped about how dinosaur lineages with no evidence for feathers at all were now being given fabulous coats. In the midst of this, I decried the new crop of bad paleo-art, using this image as my piéce de resistance: Credit: Luis V. Rey, from his blog . Essentially my big scientific argument ran along the lines of, "Looks dumb, therefore wrong". It seems now that I might have to eat that argument, slathered in Nelson Muntz' Gourmet Ha-Ha Sauce ...with one important caveat, which I'll get to later. Since writing that blog post - in fact, several years later - I'...